Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has challenged the court order proscribing his group and declaring it a terrorist group.
Kanu’s lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor argued that IPOB is a non-violent organisation and the court denied it fair hearing before issuing the order.
The lawyer added that the court lacked the jurisdiction to grant such a ruling as members of the group who are mostly of Igbo extraction have no history of violence.
Related posts:
Court declares proscription of IPOB as unlawful
League of lawyers asks US Embassy to withdraw statement endorsing IPOB
No comment yet on proscription order – IMN
UPDATED: IMN defies proscription order, stages another protest in Abuja
Federal government releases official gazette on Proscription of banditry
NGE Salutes Federal High Court Over Perpetual Order Against NBC
Proscription of IMN: Shi’ites head to court
JUST IN: Court fixes Sept. 11 for hearing of application challenging proscription of IMN
Your comment …if u r agitating 4 biafra’s sovereignty i tink u should ask ur elders abt 1967 to 1970 nd ask if they want history to repeat its self