A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
A Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed April the 25th to deliver judgment in a suit seeking to stop the National Assembly from altering the sequence of the 2019 general election.
Presiding judge, Ahmed Mohammed, adjourned the case after counsel on both sides concluded arguments.
The Accord party in challenging the legality of the lawmakers’ action, says through its counsel, Wole Olanipekun, that the move will create an abnormal situation in the electoral process.
Other parties in the suit are the National Assembly, Attorney General of the Federation and INEC.
Related posts:
Court dismisses APP’s application to join election sequence suit
Supreme Court fixes date for judgment in suit seeking to set aside charges against Onnoghen
Court fixes date for judgment in suit against Infectious diseases bill
Federal High Court fixes February for judgment in suit between AMCON, Ogboru
S’ Court fixes 27th May for judgment suit seeking to stop Rotimi Amaechi’s probe on alleged N96billion fraud
Alleged money laundering: Court fixes April 20 to hear Kalu’s suit against EFCC
ALGON leadership tussle: Court fixes April 30 for judgment
Appeal Court gives NASS victory over 2019 election sequence rRe-ordering
