The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
The Federal high court in Abuja has adjourned to 11th September to hear the application challenging the proscription of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also know as the Shi’ite movement.
Counsel to the IMN, Femi Falana moved for the application to be heard, but Counsel to the Federal government, Dayo Apata informed the court that they have filed a counter application and have served same on the applicant.
Mr Falana acknowledged the counter application and told the court that’s responses have been served.
Mr Apata asked for an adjournment to enable the federal government regularise processes
Related posts:
Proscription of IMN: Shi’ites head to court
No comment yet on proscription order – IMN
F.G. and the proscription of IMN: Matters Arising
UPDATED: IMN defies proscription order, stages another protest in Abuja
El-Zakzaky: IMN makes no-case submission, court fixes July 28th for ruling
Federal High Court hears Nnamdi Kanu’s application challenging trial
Court adjourns hearing in Kashamu’s suit challenging extradition
Alleged illegal procurement of vehicle: Court fixes 22nd for ruling on Emefiele’s bail application
