Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Supreme Court is set to hear a suit filed by the Attorney General of Ekiti State, Olawale Fapohunda against the Attorney-General of the Federation, Attorney General of Lagos and Ogun States.
Mr Olawale Fapohunda is asking the Court to determine whether the directive issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation, on 20th of April, 2020 to the Head of Courts at Federal and States level, in conjunction with Guidelines, issued by the NJC, in the conduct of virtual proceedings is a violation of the federalism provisions of the 1999 Constitution.
He is also asking the Supreme Court to set aside, the directive of the Attorney-General of the Federation and NJC Guidelines, as it relates to Virtual or Remote Court.
This is contained in the originating summons brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 6, Supreme Court Rules.
Related posts:
Supreme Court strikes out suit challenging virtual court sittings
Court hears Sunday Igboho’s N5.5b suit against FG
Lagos AG withdraws suit challanging virtual court sitting
Osinbajo commends Supreme Court’s virtual proceedings ruling
2019 Election: Supreme Court strikes out HDP’s suit against Buhari
Supreme Court to hear Buhari, Malami’s suit against Section 84(12)
Supreme court upholds N6b suit against Dakuku Peterside
Supreme Court strikes out Buhari, Malami’s suit against Electoral Act
