Fashola slams N2 Billion libel suit against Sunrise Power, Others

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.

The Minister of Works and Housing, Babatunde Fashola has instituted a N2billion defamation suit against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Sunrise Power and Transmission Company Ltd, Leno Olaitan Adesanya over some alleged libellous publications made in two national dailies.

 

Fashola, in a statement of claim in the suit before a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , accused Adesanya of making false and disparaging publications against him in The Guardian and Thisday newspapers of January 11 and 16, 2019 in respect of the Mambilla Power Project.

 

Adesanya was said to have, in the said publications, accused Fashola of frustrating the completion of the Mambila Power Project and engaging in acts of corruption in relation to the project while serving as Minister of Power, Works and Housing.

 

The Minister stated that the advertorial publications, caption: Mambilla Power Project: Open letter to Mr. Babatunde Fasola,” and sponsored by Adesanya. “amount to nothing less than character assignation, with a view to achieving damaging effects against the claimant (Fashola).

The claimant added that Adesanya and the two newspapers, by the publications in which his name was deplored, portrayed him as a dishonest and disloyal political operative, and a greedy thieving political manipulator, unworthy of his office as a minister or any other public office.

He further stated that the publications portrayed him as “a dirty politician who would take beneficial steps in governance only when it is for his personal advantage even at the risk of causing his country and political leader great harm.

Fashola, who said he has suffered embarrassment, humiliation, among others, as a result of the false publications, wants the court to award N2b damages against the defendants for damages for the libellous publications, and aggravated and exceptional damages.

He also wants an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from further publishing the offending materials or any other materials relating to the claimant.

Fashola, who equally wants the court to order the defendants to publish retractions of the damaging publications, is also seeking an order compelling the defendants to offer him “properly worded unreserved apology for the libellous advertorials.

While Adesanya and Thisday are yet to respond to the suit, The Guardian, in its statement of defence, denied any wrongdoing.

The Guardian, while pleading qualified privilege, said it acted within its constitutional responsibilities, including the duty to inform the public on matters relating to the conduct, activities, operations and policies of the state, its ministries, parastatal and agencies.

It argued that the publication referred to by Fashola “is a fair and accurate publication of a rejoinder about issues relating to the management and/or administration of the Mambilla Power Project by the claimant as to the Minister of Power.

The newspaper added that since the Mambilla Power Project is being executed with public funds, the publication complained was made in furtherance of its moral, professional and legal duty to inform the public on matters of public interest.

The Guardian stated that it did not hold Fashola in malice of in contempt and has never made any publication or done anything against him to cast him in a bad light.

At the mention of the case on Tuesday, Fashola’s lawyer, Charles Edosomwan (SAN) noted that it was only the second defendant (The Guardian) that has filed any response in the case.

Justice Sylvester Oriji noted the first and third defendants were still within the required seven days to file their responses.

Justice Oriji then adjourned till December 6 for a hearing of a pending application filed by the claimant.