A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
A Kano State High Court has perpetually restrained the Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Rano, Gaya, Bichi, and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The applicants are Attorney General of Kano State, Speaker Kano State House of Assembly and Kano State House of Assembly, through their counsel Ibrahim Isah-Wangida, filed a motion exparte dated May 27, 2024.
The applicants are seeking the court to restrain Aminu Ado-Bayero, and Four other dethroned emirs of Bichi, Rano, Gaya and Karaye from parading themselves as emirs.
The respondents in the suit are: Emir of Kano, Aminu Ado-Bayero, Emir of Bichi, Nasiru Ado-Bayero, Emir of Karaye, Ibrahim Abubakar ll, Emir of Rano, Kabiru Muhammad-Inuwa, and Emir of Gaya, Aliyu Ibrahim-Gaya.
Others are Inspector General of Police, Director State Security Service, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Army.
Delivering the judgement, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, held that Kano State House of Assembly has the power to amend and propose a bill for the peace and good governance of a state pursuant to section 4 rule 6,7(b) of 1999 Constitution as amended.
“The Kano State Governor has the right to ascent the the proposed bill to law after being passed by the state assembly”
She ordered that Ado-Bayero, and four other Emirs by themselves, servants, privies, and any other persons appointed by them from parading themselves as emirs.
Adamu-Aliyu perpetually restrained the Police and other security agencies from violating, disobeying or temparing with the Kano State Emirate (Repeal) Law 2024.
She urged all the deposed emirs to surrender all movable and inmovable properties in their possession that belongs to the Kano State Emirate Council to the state government.
“The first respondent legal counsel withdrawal without notice to other parties is unprofessional and without moving their motion is as good as not filing it since it has been abandoned.
Adamu-Aliyu said the act of the 6th to 9th respondent for smuggling the first respondent to Kano after the enactment of the the Emirate Repeal Law 2024 disregard to what they have sworn for the protection of life and property.
Earlier, Counsel to the applicant, Ibrahim Isa-Wangida, urged the court to discountenance the respondent affidavit of facts pursuant to order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Court.
Counsel to Ado-Bayero, Abdul Muhammed SAN, informed the court that they have an affidavit of fact dated July 3, 2024 attached with a notice of appeal and a motion of stay of proceedings.
He urged the court to stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the motion at the appeal court.
Counsel to the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents, Hassan Tanko-Kyaure, moved his application for extension of time dated July 2 and counter affidavit in response to the originating motion.
He urged the court to set aside the Kano State Emirates Council (Repeal) law 2024, adding that due process were not followed and urged the court to dismiss the applicant’s application with a cost of N1 billion.
Counsel to the IGP, Sunday Ekwe, told the court that they have nothing to present.
The applicants, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents moved their applications, for extension of time, notice of preliminary objection, setting aside exparte order, joinder application, examining deponent, application for the Judge to recuse herself and originating summon.
Related posts:
Court restrains LP chairman, Secretary, two others from parading as nat’l officers
Court restrains LP Chairman, secretary, two others from parading as national officers
Court restrains Giadom from parading himself as APC Chairman
Court restrains Ayu from parading himself as PDP Chairman
BREAKING: Kano govt appoints Aminu Ado Bayero as new Emir of Kano
Court nullifies appointment of new Emirs in Kano
Court declares installation of four emirs in Kano ‘illegal’
Court slams N10m fine against Kano govt for allegedly breaching Emir Bayero’s right
