The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
The United States Supreme Court has blocked Joe Biden’s plan to forgive student debt, striking down the US president’s push to cancel billions of dollars in college loans.
The top court said the Biden administration does not have the authority to cancel the debt of millions of Americans.
The 6-3 decision was split along the court’s idealogical lines with the conservative majority prevailing.
It deals an enormous blow to millions of borrowers and to a major policy and campaign promise by the Democratic president ahead of the 2024 elections. Student loan relief has been a top demand for progressives, who argue that college debt is stifling young people’s social mobility and widening the racial wealth gap.
Critics have said it is unfair to those who had already paid for their own educations or who chose not to attend college.
They also argued that loan forgiveness does not address the root causes of student debt – soaring college costs in the US.
Biden in August announced his student loan forgiveness programme, which would cancel $10,000 to $20,000 in debt to students and graduates. But before the debt forgiveness applications became available, lower courts suspended the programme after lawsuits by Republican states.
The top court balked at the price tag of the debt relief, estimated to be $430bn, saying the executive branch cannot move forward with the plan without explicit authorisation from Congress.
“Our precedent – old and new – requires that Congress speak clearly before a Department [of Education] secretary can unilaterally alter large sections of the American economy,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
Biden had relied on the HEROES Act, a 2003 law that allowed the Department of Education to provide student debt relief in cases of a “national emergency”.
Former President Donald Trump froze student loan payments at the outset of the pandemic in 2020. But that pause is due to expire this year, resuming what many students and graduates describe as a huge financial burden.
The Supreme Court ultimately decided that student loan forgiveness exceeds the powers granted by the HEROES Act.
With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, Congress is unlikely to pass college debt relief legislation.
A Senate legislative procedure known as the filibuster, which requires 60 out of 100 senators to agree to end debate and proceed to votes on bills, also makes it difficult to approve student loan forgiveness in the near future, even if Democrats gain control of both chambers of Congress.
Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, was quick to denounce the high court’s ruling, calling the conservative-dominated judicial body “extreme”. She added that student debt is preventing people from fully participating in the US economy.
“So many of the people affected are Black, brown, Indigenous and poor folks. This is a terrible decision,” Jayapal said in a video released on social media.
But Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who represents Arkansas, welcomed the ruling.
“Biden’s student loan transfer scheme required millions of Arkansans to pay off the loans of rich doctors and lawyers. The Supreme Court was right to strike this scam down,” he wrote on Twitter.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy also backed Friday’s ruling. “The 87% of Americans without student loans are no longer forced to pay for the 13% who do,” he said in a social media post.
McCarthy noted that the court’s opinion cited his Democratic predecessor, Nancy Pelosi, as saying that the president does not have the power to forgive student debt. “I agree with her for once!” the House speaker wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, liberal Justice Elena Kagan accused the Supreme Court’s majority of overstepping its “limited role” in interfering with the nation’s governance.
She argued that forgiving student debt is within the authority of the executive branch, and that the plaintiffs – six Republican states – had no standing legal ground to challenge the policy.
“A court may address the legality of a government action only if the person challenging it has standing – which requires that the person have suffered a ‘concrete and particularized injury’,” Kagan wrote.
Friday’s decision is the latest ruling by the top court to advance right-wing political causes. On Thursday, justices ruled that colleges cannot consider race when assessing college application.
Related posts:
President Joe Biden announces Students Loan Forgiveness
Meet the Bidens: America’s new ‘first family’
U.S. Supreme Court blocks Trump bid to end ‘Dreamers’ immigrant program
British court blocks Julian Assange’s extradition to America
Nigeria has no need for debt forgiveness – DMO
Greek train crash: PM Mitsotakis seeks forgiveness from families amid protests
Gov. Ishaku preaches Love, seeks forgiveness from Taraba residents
‘I’m sorry’, Shaibu begs Obaseki for forgiveness
