The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
The Court of Appeal has struck out a suit challenging the academic qualification of president Muhammadu Buhari.
In a judgment read by Justice Mohammed Idris on behalf of the three-man panel, the court decided to settle the case on the preliminary objection, stressing the need to pay attention to when the cause of action arose.
The court further held that in line with section 285 sub section nine of the constitution, the suit was not filed within the time allowed by law.
The plaintiffs Kalu Kalu, Labaran Ismail and Hassy Kyari el-Kuris, had approached the appellate court to nullify and set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declined to hear a suit they instituted to challenge the educational qualification of Mr Buhari before the conduct of 2019 general election.
Related posts:
Supreme court dismisses suit challenging Wike’s qualification to contest Rivers gov’ship election
Supreme Court strikes out suit challenging virtual court sittings
Court strikes out suit challenging Gaidam’s election
Court strikes out suit challenging dismissal of unmarried pregnant Police Officer
Court strikes out suit challenging Funke Akindele, others’ COVID-19 convictions
Court strikes out petition filed by govt of Cross River challenging Onnoghen’s suspension by President Buhari
Court Strikes Out Challenging Defection Of Rivers Lawmakers
Court dismisses suit filed by Benue govt. challenging EFCC powers
